Neexo Impact Report
Virtual Commissioning business case
Professional summary of calculated savings, investment and key assumptions.
Project overview
- Customer / project
- Not specified
- Machine / system
- Not specified
- Currency
- DKK
- Report date
- 07/02/2026
Assessment
Good business case
The VC cost represents 0% of the gross saving. Below 100% indicates that gross saving exceeds the investment.
Hours saved
159 h
Gross savings
DKK 127,500
VC cost
DKK 0
VC cost share
0%
Net return
N/A
Net effect
DKK 127,500
Executive summary
The model shows 159 saved hours and gross savings of DKK 127,500. After a VC investment of DKK 0, the net effect is DKK 127,500. The largest value driver is SAT onsite, accounting for 65% of total savings.
Financial assumptions
Business interpretation
Savings by phase
| Phase | Hours without VC | Reduction with VC | Hours saved | Extra savings | Gross savings | of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development | 300 h | 20% | 60 h | DKK 0 | DKK 0 | 0% |
| Test & FAT | 250 h | 30% | 75 h | DKK 45,000 | DKK 45,000 | 35% |
| SAT onsite | 120 h | 20% | 24 h | DKK 82,500 | DKK 82,500 | 65% |
Method and scope
The calculation uses project-specific inputs for person-hours, reduction rate, weekly cost and VC project cost. The result is a decision basis and should be validated against historical project data.
Optional Value Layer — Overview
Beyond the core Virtual Commissioning savings, the following optional value streams have been assessed. Included streams contribute to the combined potential.
| Value stream | Status | Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Sales & customer alignment | Not included | — |
| Marketing & interactive product demo | Not included | — |
| Training & onboarding | Not included | — |
| Documentation & knowledge reuse | Not included | — |
| Service & remote support | Not included | — |
| Future project reuse | Not included | — |
| Quality & rework risk | Not included | — |
| Operations & maintenance optimization | Not included | — |